I get your intent, though. I’m pretty sure you’re comparing our wonderful advancements in other areas to our backward approach to abortions — we actually make the mother listen to a description of the child she and the doctor are going to kill, “even if both are unwilling.” And to do so, a transducer must “be inserted in the vagina if that method produces the best ultrasound image.”
What torture! Sorry to be crass, but if the fair sex kept other things from being inserted in their vaginas, we wouldn’t have nearly as big a problem. I did find it intensely interesting that you were so passionate about the female abortioner’s comfort and failed to say a word about the life she is planning on destroying. Nor did you mention how lucky you were to arrive at a convenient time for your mother, and that she decided to suffer the problems, discomfort, expense and pain of bringing you into the world instead of snuffing you out like a cigarette butt.
Opinions expressed on
the commentary page, in letters to the editor and elsewhere in this
newspaper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
opinions of ownership or management.
Gazette provides an open forum for the discussion of all points of view
in its Letters to the Editor section. The Gazette reserves the right to
edit letters for length and clarity. Letters can be mailed, faxed,
emailed to firstname.lastname@example.org or sent online at okgazette.com, but
include a city of residence and contact number for verification.