Poor figures, poor logic

The
first problem is the use of a national figure for poverty. There is no
national poverty level. Poverty in New England is a far cry from poverty
in Oklahoma; dollars in these two parts of the nation are not equal.
Poverty incomes in New York are middle-income in Oklahoma, and so on.

Another
statistical problem is talk of a bigger percentage of gains in the
upper-level incomes and lesser gains in the lower-level incomes. One’s
entire life is a steady increase in one’s income, from the lower levels
to middle and, hopefully, higher. That’s precisely why gains are bigger
in the higher incomes and not as high in the lower.

Poverty is not a nice place to be.

That’s
why people tend to work their way out of it. That’s why welfare is so
insidious; it makes poverty semi-comfy as it destroys the work ethic.

Common sense must always be present when using statistics to find the real bottom line.

—Thomas Furlong, Oklahoma City

Thomas L. Furlong

This material falls under the archives category because it was imported from our previous website. It will eventually be filtered into the proper category as time allows.

Related posts

*

*

Top
WordPress Lightbox